Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Ultra-high foraging rates of harbor porpoises make them vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Danuta Maria Wisniewska, Mark Johnson, Jonas Teilmann, Laia Rojano-Doñate, Jeanne Shearer, Signe Sveegaard, Lee A. Miller, Ursula Siebert, Peter Teglberg Madsen

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Summary. The question of how individuals acquire and allocate resources to maximize fitness is central in evolutionary ecology. Basic information on prey selection, search effort, and capture rates are critical for understanding a predator’s role in its ecosystem and for predicting its response to natural and anthropogenic disturbance. Yet, for most marine species, foraging interactions cannot be observed directly. The high costs of thermoregulation in water require that small marine mammals have elevated energy intakes compared to similar-sized terrestrial mammals [1]. The combination of high food requirements and their position at the apex of most marine food webs may make small marine mammals particularly vulnerable to changes within the ecosystem [2–4], but the lack of detailed information about their foraging behavior often precludes an informed conservation effort. Here, we use high-resolution movement and prey echo recording tags on five wild harbor porpoises to examine foraging interactions in one of the most metabolically challenged cetacean species. We report that porpoises forage nearly continuously day and night, attempting to capture up to 550 small (3–10 cm) fish prey per hour with a remarkable prey capture success rate of >90%. Porpoises therefore target fish that are smaller than those of commercial interest, but must forage almost continually to meet their metabolic demands with such small prey, leaving little margin for compensation. Thus, for these “aquatic shrews,” even a moderate level of anthropogenic disturbance in the busy shallow waters they share with humans may have severe fitness consequences at individual and population levels.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1441-1446
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume26
Issue number11
Early online date26 May 2016
DOIs
StatePublished - 6 Jun 2016

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Click communication in wild harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena)

    Sørensen, P. M., Wisniewska, D. M., Jensen, F. H., Johnson, M., Teilmann, J. & Madsen, P. T. 26 Jun 2018 In : Scientific Reports. 8, 11 p., 9702

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Night-life of Bryde’s whales: ecological implications of resting in a baleen whale

    Izadi, S., Johnson, M., de Soto, N. A. & Constantine, R. May 2018 In : Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 72, 5, 78

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. High rates of vessel noise disrupt foraging in wild harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena)

    Wisniewska, D. M., Johnson, M., Teilmann, J., Siebert, U., Galatius, A., Dietz, R. & Madsen, P. T. 14 Feb 2018 In : Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 285, 1872, 20172314

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Dive heart rate in harbour porpoises is influenced by exercise and expectations

    McDonald, B., Johnson, M. & Madsen, P. 9 Nov 2017 In : Journal of Experimental Biology.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. High suckling rates and acoustic crypsis of humpback whale neonates maximise potential for mother–calf energy transfer

    Videsen, S. K. A., Bejder, L., Johnson, M. & Madsen, P. T. Aug 2017 In : Functional Ecology. 31, 8, p. 1561-1573

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Bonobos prefer individuals that hinder others over those that help

    Krupenye, C. & Hare, B. 22 Jan 2018 In : Current Biology. 28, 2, p. 280-286 e5

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Chimpanzees consider humans' psychological states when drawing statistical inferences

    Eckert, J., Rakoczy, H., Call, J., Herrmann, E. & Hanus, D. 18 Jun 2018 In : Current Biology. 28, 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Payoff- and sex-biased social learning interact in a wild primate population

    Bono, A. E. J., Whiten, A., van Schaik, C., Krützen, M., Eichenberger, F., Schnider, A. & van de Waal, E. 10 Sep 2018 In : Current Biology. 28, 17, p. 2800-2805.e4

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Population consequences of migratory variability differ between flyways

    Patchett, R., Finch, T. & Cresswell, W. 23 Apr 2018 In : Current Biology. 28, 8, p. R340-R341

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. The role of association in pre-schoolers' solutions to "spoon tests" of future planning

    Dickerson, K. L., Ainge, J. A. & Seed, A. M. 23 Jul 2018 In : Current Biology. 28, 14, p. 2309-2313

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Current Biology (Journal)

    Kate Arnold (Reviewer)
    2007 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workPeer review of manuscripts

  2. Current Biology (Journal)

    Byrne, R. W. (Member of editorial board)
    20052014

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

ID: 243241876