Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Ultra-high foraging rates of harbor porpoises make them vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Danuta Maria Wisniewska, Mark Johnson, Jonas Teilmann, Laia Rojano-Doñate, Jeanne Shearer, Signe Sveegaard, Lee A. Miller, Ursula Siebert, Peter Teglberg Madsen

School/Research organisations

Abstract

The question of how individuals acquire and allocate resources to maximize fitness is central in evolutionary ecology. Basic information on prey selection, search effort, and capture rates are critical for understanding a predator’s role in its ecosystem and for predicting its response to natural and anthropogenic disturbance. Yet, for most marine species, foraging interactions cannot be observed directly. The high costs of thermoregulation in water require that small marine mammals have elevated energy intakes compared to similar-sized terrestrial mammals [1]. The combination of high food requirements and their position at the apex of most marine food webs may make small marine mammals particularly vulnerable to changes within the ecosystem [2–4], but the lack of detailed information about their foraging behavior often precludes an informed conservation effort. Here, we use high-resolution movement and prey echo recording tags on five wild harbor porpoises to examine foraging interactions in one of the most metabolically challenged cetacean species. We report that porpoises forage nearly continuously day and night, attempting to capture up to 550 small (3–10 cm) fish prey per hour with a remarkable prey capture success rate of >90%. Porpoises therefore target fish that are smaller than those of commercial interest, but must forage almost continually to meet their metabolic demands with such small prey, leaving little margin for compensation. Thus, for these “aquatic shrews,” even a moderate level of anthropogenic disturbance in the busy shallow waters they share with humans may have severe fitness consequences at individual and population levels.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1441-1446
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume26
Issue number11
Early online date26 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jun 2016

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by journal

  1. African elephants interpret a trunk gesture as a clue to direction of interest

    Smet, A. F. & Byrne, R. W., 17 Aug 2020, In: Current Biology. 30, 16, p. R926-R927

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

  2. Cat Hobaiter

    Hobaiter, C., 17 Aug 2020, In: Current Biology. 30, 16, p. R912-R914

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Fan cells in layer 2 of lateral entorhinal cortex are critical for episodic-like memory

    Vandrey, B. M., Garden, D. L. F., Ambrozova, V., McClure, C., Nolan, M. & Ainge, J. A., 6 Jan 2020, In: Current Biology. 30, 1, p. 169-175 e5.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Same-sex sexual behaviour

    Balfour, V. L. & Shuker, D. M., 16 Nov 2020, In: Current Biology. 30, 22, p. R1345-R1346

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. The importance of being in situ

    Hobaiter, C., 9 Mar 2020, In: Current Biology. 30, 5, p. R199-R201 3 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

Related by journal

  1. Current Biology (Journal)

    Kate Arnold (Reviewer)

    2007 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  2. Current Biology (Journal)

    Richard William Byrne (Member of editorial board)

    20052014

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

ID: 243241876

Top