Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Understanding POWER Multiprocessors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Author(s)

Susmit Sarkar, Peter Sewell, Jade Alglave, Luc Maranget, Derek Williams

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Exploiting today's multiprocessors requires high-performance and correct concurrent systems code (optimising compilers, language runtimes, OS kernels, etc.), which in turn requires a good understanding of the observable processor behaviour that can be relied on. Unfortunately this critical hardware/software interface is not at all clear for several current multiprocessors.

In this paper we characterise the behaviour of IBM POWER multiprocessors, which have a subtle and highly relaxed memory model (ARM multiprocessors have a very similar architecture in this respect). We have conducted extensive experiments on several generations of processors: POWER G5, 5, 6, and 7. Based on these, on published details of the microarchitectures, and on discussions with IBM staff, we give an abstract-machine semantics that abstracts from most of the implementation detail but explains the behaviour of a range of subtle examples. Our semantics is explained in prose but defined in rigorous machine-processed mathematics; we also confirm that it captures the observable processor behaviour, or the architectural intent, for our examples with an executable checker. While not officially sanctioned by the vendor, we believe that this model gives a reasonable basis for reasoning about current POWER multiprocessors.

Our work should bring new clarity to concurrent systems programming for these architectures, and is a necessary precondition for any analysis or verification. It should also inform the design of languages such as C and C++, where the language memory model is constrained by what can be efficiently compiled to such multiprocessors.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-186
Number of pages12
JournalACM SIGPLAN Notices
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

    Research areas

  • Standardization, Documentation, MICROARCHITECTURE, Relaxed Memory Models, Reliability, Verification, MODELS, SHARED-MEMORY, Semantics, Theory, Languages

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Memory consistency models using constraints

    Akgün, Ö., Hoffmann, R. & Sarkar, S. 27 Aug 2018 The Seventeenth Workshop on Constraint Modelling and Reformulation (ModRef 2018), Proceedings. 16 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

  2. Automatically deriving cost models for structured parallel processes using hylomorphisms

    Castro, D., Hammond, K., Sarkar, S. & Alguwaifli, Y. Feb 2018 In : Future Generation Computer Systems. 79, Part 2, p. 653-668

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Simplifying ARM concurrency: multicopy-atomic axiomatic and operational models for ARMv8

    Pulte, C., Flur, S., Deacon, W., French, J., Sarkar, S. & Sewell, P. Jan 2018 Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages (POPL '18). New York: ACM, Vol. 2 Issue POPL, 29 p. 19

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

  4. Verification of a lazy cache coherence protocol against a weak memory model

    Banks, C., Elver, M., Hoffmann, R., Sarkar, S., Jackson, P. & Nagarajan, V. 2 Oct 2017 Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD). ACM, p. 60-67

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

  5. Mixed-size Concurrency: ARM, POWER, C/C++11, and SC

    Flur, S., Sarkar, S., Pulte, C., Nienhuis, K., Maranget, L., Gray, K., Sezgin, A., Batty, M. & Sewell, P. 1 Jan 2017 Proceedings of the 44th annual ACM-SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of programming languages. ACM, p. 429-442

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Related by journal

  1. Clarifying and Compiling C/C++ Concurrency: from C++11 to POWER

    Batty, M., Memarian, K., Owens, S., Sarkar, S. & Sewell, P. Jan 2012 In : ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 47, 1, p. 509-520 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Synchronising C/C plus plus and POWER

    Sarkar, S., Memarian, K., Owens, S., Batty, M., Sewell, P., Maranget, L., Alglave, J. & Williams, D. Jun 2012 In : ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 47, 6, p. 311-321 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Mathematizing C++ Concurrency

    Batty, M., Owens, S., Sarkar, S., Sewell, P. & Weber, T. Jan 2011 In : ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 46, 1, p. 55-66 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. The Semantics of x86-CC Multiprocessor Machine Code

    Sarkar, S., Sewell, P., Nardelli, F. Z., Owens, S., Ridge, T., Braibant, T., Myreen, M. O. & Alglave, J. Jan 2009 In : ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 44, 1, p. 379-391 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 44377570