Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Using Genuine Savings for climate policy evaluation with an integrated assessment model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Koji Tokimatsu, Louis Dupuy, Nick Hanley

School/Research organisations

Abstract

There has been a recent increase in efforts to develop broader models to assess the impact of climate change and climate change policies, both in terms of impact measures (beyond GDP) and in terms of modelling complexity (beyond DICE/RICE models). Climate policies aimed at reducing CO2 emissions can have impacts in multiple sectors of the economy, and can change consumption levels over time. We show how the sustainability indicator Genuine Savings can be endogenised within a general equilibrium model and used as a criterion for judging the impacts of such policies in terms of future well-being. Differences in Genuine Savings rates between CO2 emission reduction scenarios are discussed. We show how a broader, Genuine Savings-based assessment of climate change can result in a re-evaluation of the consequences and costs of inaction in terms of various climate change-related policies; and how multiple environmental and well-being outcomes can be analysed within a unified modelling framework.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages27
JournalEnvironmental and Resource Economics
VolumeFirst Online
Early online date12 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Oct 2018

    Research areas

  • Genuine Savings (GS), Integrated assessment model (IAM), Lifecycle impact assessment (LCIA), Sustainability, Policy analysis

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. The effects of disease on optimal forest rotation: a generalisable analytical framework

    Macpherson, M. F., Kleczkowski, A., Healey, J. R. & Hanley, N., Jul 2018, In : Environmental and Resource Economics. 70, 3, p. 565-588 24 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. What a difference a stochastic process makes: epidemiological-based real options models of optimal treatment of disease

    Dangerfield, C. E., Whalley, A. E., Hanley, N. & Gilligan, C. A., Jul 2018, In : Environmental and Resource Economics. 70, 3, p. 691-711 21 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The allure of the illegal: choice modeling of rhino horn demand in Vietnam

    Hanley, N., Sheremet, O. I., Bozzola, M. & MacMillan, D. C., 30 May 2018, In : Conservation Letters. 11, 3, e12417.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Reshaping Energy Governance in the Arctic? Assessing the implications of LNG for European Shipping Companies

    Holmes, R., McCauley, D. & Hanley, N., 13 Feb 2018, Arctic Marine Resource Governance and Development. Vestergaard, N., Kaiser, B., Fernandez, L. & Larsen, J. (eds.). Springer, p. 19-32

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Related by journal

  1. Altruism and global environmental taxes

    Daube, M., 20 Sep 2018, In : Environmental and Resource Economics. First Online, 24 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. The effects of disease on optimal forest rotation: a generalisable analytical framework

    Macpherson, M. F., Kleczkowski, A., Healey, J. R. & Hanley, N., Jul 2018, In : Environmental and Resource Economics. 70, 3, p. 565-588 24 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. What a difference a stochastic process makes: epidemiological-based real options models of optimal treatment of disease

    Dangerfield, C. E., Whalley, A. E., Hanley, N. & Gilligan, C. A., Jul 2018, In : Environmental and Resource Economics. 70, 3, p. 691-711 21 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 256146046

Top