Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

What type of resistance? How apocalyptic discourse functions as social discourse in Mark's Gospel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Author(s)

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Several scholars analyze the social dimensions of Mark’s apocalyptic discourse through socio-political or postcolonial models to identify Mark as resistance literature. Alternatively, this study uses literary analysis and metaphor theory to argue that Mark employs apocalyptic discourse for theological reasons with political implications. After evaluating representative socio-political and postcolonial interpretations and establishing the concept of apocalyptic discourse in light of the narrative’s theological and political aims, this study does two things: (1) it explains the function of Mark’s apocalyptic topoi to redefine the social concept of the family in order to explore the formation of the community that follows Jesus, and (2) it analyzes Mk 8.27–10.45 to demonstrate how apocalyptic discourse functions as social discourse in shaping that community’s identity and practice. The primary function of Mark’s apocalyptic discourse is not to combat alienation from the dominant cultural community, but from Jesus’ community as a result of misunderstanding and unbelief.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-406
JournalJournal for the Study of the New Testament
Volume37
Issue number4
Early online date11 May 2015
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2015
Scopus citations0

    Research areas

  • Gospel of Mark, Apocalyptic discourse, Discipleship, Metaphor, Roman Empire

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Communication, Pedagogy, and the Gospel of Mark

    Shively, E. E. (ed.) & Van Oyen, G. (ed.) 2016 Atlanta: SBL Press. (Resources for Biblical Studies; vol. 83)

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  2. Introduction: Recovering the Relationship Between Research and Teaching

    Shively, E. E. 2016 Communication, Pedagogy, and the Gospel of Mark. Shively, E. E. & Van Oyen, G. (eds.). Atlanta: SBL Press, p. 1-9 (Resources for Biblical Studies; vol. 83)

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  3. Characterizing the Non-Human: Satan in the Gospel of Mark

    Shively, E. E. 2014 Character Studies and the Gospel of Mark. Skinner, C. & Hauge, M. (eds.). T&T Clark, (Library of New Testament Studies)

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Related by journal

  1. Review Article: The Deliverance of God

    Macaskill, G. Dec 2011 In : Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 34, 2, p. 150-161

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Effective-History and the Hermeneutics of Ulrich Luz

    Elliott, M. W. Dec 2010 In : Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 33 , 2, p. 161-173 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Exposing the Economic Middle: A Revised Economy Scale for the Study of Early Urban Christianity

    Longenecker, B. W. Mar 2009 In : Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 31, 3, p. 243-278

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Journal for the Study of the New Testament (Journal)

    Philip Francis Esler (Editor)
    2005 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

  2. Journal for the Study of the New Testament (Journal)

    Bruce Ward Longenecker (Member of editorial board)
    2002 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

  3. Journal for the Study of the New Testament (Journal)

    Wright, N. T. (Member of editorial board)
    19911996

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

ID: 157153225