Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

What's occurring? Ultrasonic signature whistle use in Welsh bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Helen M. Hiley, Sarah Perry, Steve Hartley, Stephanie L. King

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Animal communication signals are diverse. The types of sounds that animals produce, and the way that information is encoded in those sounds, not only varies between species but can also vary geographically within a species. Therefore, an understanding of the vocal repertoire at the population level is important for providing insight into regional differences in vocal communication signals. One species whose vocal repertoire has received considerable attention is the bottlenose dolphin. This species is well known for its use of individually distinctive identity signals, known as signature whistles. Bottlenose dolphins use their signature whistles to broadcast their identity and to maintain contact with social companions. Signature whistles are not innate, but are learnt signals that develop within the first few months of an animal’s life. It is therefore unsurprising that studies which have characterized signature whistles in wild populations of bottlenose dolphins have provided evidence of geographic variation in signature whistle structure. Here, we describe the occurrence of signature whistles in a previously unexplored wild population of bottlenose dolphins in Cardigan Bay, Wales. We present the first occurrence of a signature whistle with an ultrasonic fundamental frequency component (>30 kHz), a frequency band that was not thought to be utilized by this species for whistle communication. We also describe the occurrence of an ultrasonic non-signature whistle. Our findings highlight the importance of conducting regional studies in order to fully quantify a species’ vocal repertoire, and call into question the efficacy of those studies that use restricted sampling rates.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-35
Number of pages10
JournalBioacoustics
Volume26
Issue number1
Early online date25 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by journal

  1. Crowd intelligence can discern between repertoires of killer whale ecotypes

    Danishevskaya, A. Y., Filatova, O. A., Samarra, F. I. P., Miller, P. J. O., Ford, J. K. B., Yurk, H., Matkin, C. O. & Hoyt, E., 31 Oct 2018, In : Bioacoustics. Latest Articles , 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Mid-frequency broadband sounds of Blainville's beaked whales: Bioacoustics

    Dunn, C. A., Hickmott, L. S., Talbot, D., Boyd, I. & Rendell, L. E., 7 Jan 2013, In : Bioacoustics. 22, 2, p. 153-163 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Assessing effects of anthropogenic noise on the behaviour of marine mammals

    Nowacek, D. P. & Tyack, P. L., 1 Jan 2008, In : Bioacoustics. 17, 1-3, p. 338-341 4 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Big bang? intense ultrasound does not have any detectable effects on the squid loligo pealeii

    Wilson, M., Hanlon, R. T., Tyack, P. L. & Madsen, P. T., 1 Jan 2008, In : Bioacoustics. 17, 1-3, p. 321-323 3 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 260440731

Top