Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Why ‘jurisdiction’? Determining boundaries in offshore finance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Why ‘jurisdiction’? Determining boundaries in offshore finance. / Vlcek, William.

In: Small States and Territories, Vol. 1, No. 2, 11.2018, p. 169-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Vlcek, W 2018, 'Why ‘jurisdiction’? Determining boundaries in offshore finance', Small States and Territories, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 169-182. <https://www.um.edu.mt/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/369085/SST-1-2-2018-Vlcek.pdf>

APA

Vlcek, W. (2018). Why ‘jurisdiction’? Determining boundaries in offshore finance. Small States and Territories, 1(2), 169-182. https://www.um.edu.mt/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/369085/SST-1-2-2018-Vlcek.pdf

Vancouver

Vlcek W. Why ‘jurisdiction’? Determining boundaries in offshore finance. Small States and Territories. 2018 Nov;1(2):169-182.

Author

Vlcek, William. / Why ‘jurisdiction’? Determining boundaries in offshore finance. In: Small States and Territories. 2018 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 169-182.

Bibtex - Download

@article{d7925db87b734448ba21fda3d0074bb1,
title = "Why {\textquoteleft}jurisdiction{\textquoteright}? Determining boundaries in offshore finance",
abstract = "This article examines the terminology used when analysing offshore finance, specifically the application of {\textquoteleft}jurisdiction{\textquoteright} in this context. The analysis is developed by first explicating the non-sovereign territory and the shape of sovereignty as experienced and practised in these territories. This foundation then is used to outline the shape and extent of an {\textquoteleft}archipelago{\textquoteright} of offshore finance composed of both sovereign states and non-sovereign territories. The offshore archipelago serves as an intermediary in the transfer of capital from its source location to its destination, which brings it into direct contact with the global financial governance initiatives promulgated by the G20 for the welfare of its membership. In closing, the implications for the offshore jurisdiction are briefly considered in the case of the constitutional relationship governing the United Kingdom{\textquoteright}s Overseas Territories.",
keywords = "Global financial governance, Jurisdiction, Non-sovereign territories, Offshore finance, Panama Papers, Paradise Papers, Small states, Subnational jurisdictions, Tax haven",
author = "William Vlcek",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "169--182",
journal = "Small States and Territories",
number = "2",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why ‘jurisdiction’? Determining boundaries in offshore finance

AU - Vlcek, William

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - This article examines the terminology used when analysing offshore finance, specifically the application of ‘jurisdiction’ in this context. The analysis is developed by first explicating the non-sovereign territory and the shape of sovereignty as experienced and practised in these territories. This foundation then is used to outline the shape and extent of an ‘archipelago’ of offshore finance composed of both sovereign states and non-sovereign territories. The offshore archipelago serves as an intermediary in the transfer of capital from its source location to its destination, which brings it into direct contact with the global financial governance initiatives promulgated by the G20 for the welfare of its membership. In closing, the implications for the offshore jurisdiction are briefly considered in the case of the constitutional relationship governing the United Kingdom’s Overseas Territories.

AB - This article examines the terminology used when analysing offshore finance, specifically the application of ‘jurisdiction’ in this context. The analysis is developed by first explicating the non-sovereign territory and the shape of sovereignty as experienced and practised in these territories. This foundation then is used to outline the shape and extent of an ‘archipelago’ of offshore finance composed of both sovereign states and non-sovereign territories. The offshore archipelago serves as an intermediary in the transfer of capital from its source location to its destination, which brings it into direct contact with the global financial governance initiatives promulgated by the G20 for the welfare of its membership. In closing, the implications for the offshore jurisdiction are briefly considered in the case of the constitutional relationship governing the United Kingdom’s Overseas Territories.

KW - Global financial governance

KW - Jurisdiction

KW - Non-sovereign territories

KW - Offshore finance

KW - Panama Papers

KW - Paradise Papers

KW - Small states

KW - Subnational jurisdictions

KW - Tax haven

UR - https://www.um.edu.mt/sst/sst12nov2018

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 169

EP - 182

JO - Small States and Territories

JF - Small States and Territories

IS - 2

ER -

Related by author

  1. Teaching International Relations at the University of St Andrews (Scotland)

    Vlcek, W. & Bower, A. S., May 2021, In: International Studies Perspectives. 22, 2, p. 140 - 144

    Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

  2. A tale of two currencies: talking about money and (de)securitising moves in the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum

    Donnelly, F. & Vlcek, W., 19 Jan 2021, In: Critical Studies on Security. Latest articles, 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. The IPE of Money Laundering and Terrorist Finance

    Vlcek, W. B., 30 Apr 2020, The Routledge Handbook to International Political Economy: Conversations and Inquiries. Vivares, E. (ed.). 1 ed. Routledge, p. 843-859 17 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  4. How Macau became the world’s casino capital

    Vlcek, W. B., 3 Jan 2019, The Conversation.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

ID: 256025444

Top