Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Why philosophers shouldn't do semantics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Links

Abstract

The linguistic turn provided philosophers with a range of reasons for engaging in careful investigation into the nature and structure of language. However, the linguistic turn is dead. The arguments for it have been abandoned (for good reasons). This raises the question: why should philosophers take an interest in the minutiae of natural language semantics? I’ll argue that there isn’t much of a reason - philosophy of language has lost its way. Then I provide a suggestion for how it can find its way again.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)743-762
Number of pages20
JournalReview of Philosophy and Psychology
Volume8
Issue number4
Early online date31 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Metasemantic Anarchy, Verbal Disputes, and Conceptual Engineering

    Cappelen, H. W., 2018, Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics . Cappelen, H., Burgess, A. & D. P. (eds.). Oxford University Press

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  2. Relative Truth

    Cappelen, H. & Huvenes, T., 2018, Oxford Handbook of Truth. Glanzberg, M. (ed.). Oxford University Press

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther contribution

  3. Disagreement in Philosophy: An Optimistic Perspective

    Cappelen, H., 2017, Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology. D'Oro, G. & Overgaard, S. (eds.).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther contribution

  4. How to Combine Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism

    Cappelen, H. W., 2017, Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism, . Ichikawa, J. (ed.).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

ID: 252084813

Top