Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Why preen others? Predictors of allopreening in parrots and corvids and comparisons to grooming in great apes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Alejandra Morales Picard, Roger Mundry, Alice M. Auersperg, Emily R. Boeving, Palmyre H. Boucherie, Thomas Bugnyar, Valérie Dufour, Nathan J. Emery, Ira G. Federspiel, Gyula K. Gajdon, Jean-Pascal Guéry, Matjaž Hegedič, Lisa Horn, Eithne Kavanagh, Megan L. Lambert, Jorg J. M. Massen, Michelle A. Rodrigues, Martina Schiestl, Raoul Schwing, Birgit Szabo & 5 more Alex H. Taylor, Jayden O. van Horik, Auguste M. P. von Bayern, Amanda Seed, Katie E. Slocombe

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Allogrooming in primates serves not only a hygienic function, but also plays a crucial role in maintaining strong affiliative bonds between group members, which in turn, underpin the emergence of cooperative behavior. In contrast, although allopreening occurs in many avian species, we know little about its social functions. Our study addresses this issue by investigating allopreening in a broad comparative data set including six corvid and nine parrot species. We assessed whether rates of allopreening initiations, proportion of time spent allopreening, and the number of grooming partners in captive group‐housed birds were comparable to patterns observed in captive chimpanzees and bonobos. While parrots and corvids were found to have similar rates of social grooming to bonobos and chimpanzees, Pan species dedicated significantly more time to social grooming. Animals in larger groups had more grooming partners, but when controlling for the number of potential partners, birds tended to have fewer grooming interaction partners than Pan species. We then investigated whether allopreening in parrots and corvids was predicted by behavioral markers of affiliative social bonds (close physical proximity, active feeding, and low levels of agonistic behavior). Results revealed that providing allopreening to a partner was significantly predicted by often being in close proximity, but not engagement in active feeding or agonistic behavior. We examined the region allopreened in a subset of species and found that preening a partner's head was predicted by both close physical proximity and active feeding, while body allopreening was only predicted by close physical proximity. Head preening may confer more hygienic benefits to recipients, and thus, may be more selectively provided to valued partners. Results support the hypothesis that allopreening in corvids and parrots helps maintain social bonds with an individual's most important social partners, showing some similarities to allogrooming in primates.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-228
JournalEthology
Volume126
Issue number2
Early online date16 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jan 2020

    Research areas

  • Affiliative relationships, Allogrooming, Allopreening, Corvids, Parrots, Primates, Social bonds

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Understanding Human Cognitive Uniqueness

    Laland, K. & Seed, A., 4 Jan 2021, In: Annual Review of Psychology . 72, 1, p. 689-716 28 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Capuchin monkeys individuate objects based on spatio-temporal and property/kind information: evidence from looking and reaching measures

    Kersken, V., Zhang, D., Gomez, J-C., Seed, A. M. & Ball, D. N., 1 Aug 2020, In: Animal Behavior and Cognition. 7, 3, p. 343-364 22 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Better all by myself: gaining personal experience, not watching others, improves 3-year-olds’ performance in a causal trap task

    Yuniarto, L., Gerson, S. & Seed, A. M., Jun 2020, In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 194, 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Inferring unseen causes: developmental and evolutionary origins

    Civelek, Z., Call, J. & Seed, A., 6 May 2020, In: Frontiers in Psychology. 11, 17 p., 872.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Establishing an infrastructure for collaboration in primate cognition research

    Altschul, D. M., Beran, M. J., Bohn, M., Call, J., DeTroy, S., Duguid, S. J., Egelkamp, C. L., Fichtel, C., Fischer, J., Flessert, M., Hanus, D., Haun, D. B. M., Haux, L. M., Hernandez-Aguilar, R. A., Herrmann, E., Hopper, L. M., Joly, M., Kano, F., Keupp, S., Melis, A. P. & 12 others, Motes Rodrigo, A., Ross, S. R., Sánchez-Amaro, A., Sato, Y., Schmitt, V., Schweinfurth, M. K., Seed, A. M., Taylor, D., Voelter, C. J., Warren, E., Watzek, J. & on behalf of Many Primates, 24 Oct 2019, In: PLoS One. 14, 10, 19 p., e0223675.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Ethology adopts the STRANGE framework for animal behaviour research, to improve reporting standards

    Rutz, C. & Webster, M. M., 4 Jan 2021, In: Ethology.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Me against who? Male guppies adjust mating behaviour according to their rival’s presence and attractiveness

    Órfão, I., Barbosa, M., Ojanguren, A. F., Vicente, L., Varela, S. & Magurran, A. E., 22 Mar 2019, In: Ethology. Early View, p. 1-10

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Nuthatch uses tool in London park

    Rutz, C. & Deans, S., Feb 2018, In: Ethology. 124, 2, p. 135-138

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. How does hunger affect convergence on prey patches in a social forager?

    Riddell, J. & Webster, M. M., 17 Aug 2017, In: Ethology. 123, 11, p. 811-817

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Ethology (Journal)

    Susan Denise Healy (Member of editorial board)

    1 Jan 201831 Dec 2018

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  2. Ethology (Journal)

    Christian Rutz (Editor)

    2018 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  3. Ethology (Journal)

    Susan Denise Healy (Member of editorial board)

    1 Jan 201731 Dec 2017

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  4. Ethology (Journal)

    Vincent Janik (Editor)

    1 Jan 20111 Jan 2014

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  5. Ethology (Journal)

    Vincent Janik (Editor)

    20112014

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

ID: 263713796

Top