Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Working with community researchers to enhance rural community engagement around Private Water Supplies: an exploration of the benefits and challenges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This project employed community researchers as a means of improving community engagement around their Private Water Supplies (PWS) in rural Scotland. In this paper, we reflect on working with community researchers in terms of the benefits and challenges of the approach for future rural research that seeks to improve community engagement. The paper (1) critiques the involvement of community researchers for rural community engagement, drawing on the experiences in this project and (2) provides suggestions for good practice for working with community researchers in rural communities’ research. We offer some context in terms of the role of community members in research, the importance of PWS, our approach to community researchers, followed by the methodological approach and findings and our conclusions to highlight that community researchers can be beneficial for enhancing community engagement, employability, and social capital. Future community researcher approaches need to be fully funded to ensure core researchers can fulfil their duty of care, which should not stop when data collection is finished. Community researchers need to be supported in two main ways: as continuing faces of the project after the official project end date and to transfer their newly acquired skills to future employment opportunities
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalQualitative Research
VolumeOnline First
Early online date24 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Dec 2020

    Research areas

  • Community researchers, Lay researchers, Private Water Supplies, Participatory research, Community engagement

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Policy instruments for environmental public goods: interdependencies and hybridity

    Blackstock, KL., Novo, P., Byg, A., Creaney, R., Bourke, AJ., Maxwell, JL., Tindale, SJ. & Waylen, KA., Aug 2021, In: Land Use Policy. 107, 104709.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. The contribution of healthcare smart homes to older peoples' wellbeing: a new conceptual framework

    Creaney, R., Reid, L. & Currie, M., 2021, In: Wellbeing, Space and Society. 2, 8 p., 100031.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. New knowledge networks of small-scale farmers in Europe’s periphery

    Sutherland, L-A., Madureira, L., Dirimanova, V., Bogusz, M., Kania, J., Vinohradnik, K., Creaney, R. S., Duckett, D., Koehnen, T. & Knierim, A., Apr 2017, In: Land Use Policy. 63, p. 428-439

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Criteria for a system level analysis of farm evaluation

    Prager, K., Creaney, R. S. & Lorenzo-Arribas, A., Feb 2017, In: Land Use Policy. 61, p. 86-98

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. From cartonera publishing practices to trans-formal methods for qualitiative research

    Bell, L., Flynn, A. & O'Hare, P., 6 May 2020, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Qualitative Research. Online First

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Carnivalesque collaborations: reflections on ‘doing’ multi-disciplinary research

    Spiller, K., Ball, K., Daniel, E., Dibb, S., Meadows, M. & Canhoto, A., 29 Oct 2015, In: Qualitative Research. 15, 5, p. 551-567 17 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 271487240

Top